"Blish, James - A Work of Art" - читать интересную книгу автора (Blish James)ways a perfect Strauss opera libretto, as he came gradually to
realize. "Though nominally a comedy, with a complex farcical plot, it was a verse play with considerable depth to it, and a number of characters who cried out to be brought by music into three dimensions, plus a strong undercurrent of autum- nal tragedy, of leaf-fall and apple-fallprecisely the kind of contradictory dramatic mixture which von Hofmannsthal had supplied him with in The Knight of the Rose, in Ariadne at Naxos, and in Arabella. Alas for von Hofmannsthal, but here was another long- dead playwright who seemed nearly as gifted; and the musi- cal opportunities were immense. There was, for instance, the fire which ended act two; what a gift for a composer to whom orchestration and counterpoint were as important as air and water! Or take the moment where Perpetua shoots the apple from the Duke's hand; in that one moment a single passing reference could add Rossini's marmoreal William Tell to the musical texture as nothing but an ironic footnotel And the Duke's great curtain speech, beginning: Shall I be sorry for myself? In Mortality's name I'll be sorry for myself. Branches and boughs. Brown hills, the valleys faint with brume, A burnish on the lake . .. There was a speech for a great tragic comedian, in the spirit of Falstaff; the final union of laughter and tears, punc- orous snore (trombones, no less than five of them, con sor- dini?) the opera would gently end. . . . What could be better? And yet he had come upon the play only by the unlikeliest series of accidents. At first he had planned to do a straight knockabout farce, in the idiom of The Silent Woman, just to warm himself up. Remembering that Zweig had adapted that libretto for him, in the old days, from a play by Ben Jonson, Strauss had begun to search out English plays of the period just after Jonson's, and had promptly run aground on an awful specimen in heroic couplets called Venice Preserv'd, by one Thomas Otway. The Fry play had directly followed the Otway in the card catalogue, and he had looked at it out of curiosity; why should a Twentieth Century playwright be punning on a title from the Eighteenth? After two pages of the Fry play, the minor puzzle of the pun disappeared entirely from his concern. His luck was running again; he had an opera. Sindi worked miracles in arranging for the performance. The date of the premiere was set even before the score was finished, reminding Strauss pleasantly of those heady days when Fuerstner had been snatching the conclusion of Elek- tra off his work table a page at a time, before the ink was even dry, to rush it to the engraver before publication dead- |
|
|