"Gardner Dozois - Modern CLassics of Science Fiction" - читать интересную книгу автора (Dozois Gardner)The Pure Product John Kessel
The Winter Market William Gibson Chance Connie Willis The Edge of the World Michael Swanwick Dori Bangs Bruce Sterling Afterword **** Preface Let me talk to you for a moment about a few things that this anthology is not. It is not an evolutionary overview of science fiction, for many of the stories that have had the greatest evolutionary impact on the field, and that would have to be included and analyzed in such an overview, were also stories that I personally didnтАЩt much like, and they are not here. It is not really a historical survey of the various periods of science fiction history, either, since such a survey, to function well, would have to include a balanced selection of represen-tative stories from the various history, and would have to look beyond first-rate authors to the second-rank authors, from whose work you can often get a more accurate idea of the essential nature of the different kinds of work that are being doneтАж but those stories are not here, either. (No story here was selected because it is a good example of this trend or that, or of one type of writing or another, although a few of them, by happenstance, may actually turn out to be good examples of whatever it isтАФthat is not why they are here, though.) It isnтАЩt a Politically Correct book, either, since to be Politically Correct, more care would have had to be taken in selecting the proportionately proper number of writers from each of SFтАЩs political cliques and pressure groupsтАФare there enough hard-science writers? enough leftists? enough British writers? enough women?тАФand no such demographic care was exercised. Nor is it made up of comfortably expedient choices that could be expected to score me a lot of personal brownie pointsтАФseveral of my best friends and closest colleagues have no work here, for instance, which will no doubt hurt their feelings, and there are a number of important and influential genre figures I could usefully have flattered by putting them in these pages and who will probably not be flattered by finding that they have been omitted. Nor was the book designed with an eye to insuring me a margin of safety with reviewers, since there are a number of icons, from Heinlein to Dick to Ballard, that I will no doubt be pilloried for leaving out. (Indeed, even as I write this, the critics are gleefully rubbing their hands together in anticipation, getting ready to come forward and tell me what I |
|
|