"Intoduction and Foreword by Poul Anderson" - читать интересную книгу автора (Nebula Awards)Jackpotsee the obituary sectionbut for a while, political
disagreements threatened to tear us apart. Two opposing groups were collecting signatures and contributions for two opposing statements on the Vietnam War, to be published as advertisements in some of the magazines. I happened to spearhead one of these, which involved me in a blizzard of correspondence with SFWA members as well as officers. Practically without exception, every letter I got from any sidemore than two sides exist, you knowwas both patriotic in tone and humane in spirit. The statements appeared simultaneously, and I haven't heard of any friend- ships that they broke. The experience gives me a bit of hope for our poor flayed world. Science fiction people obviously can't save it by themselves. But are they perhaps representa- tive of a larger community of people who'd rather think than scream? Let's turn from the writers to what they write, a subject doubtless more interesting to readers. I don't agree with every- thing that Will McNelly has to say about the year in novels; neither, probably, will you; and it is obvious that a substantial plurality of SFWA's professional writers won't, since their votes bestowed the Nebula on a book that leaves him cool but that they (and 1) think is a credit to the award. And so what's wrong with a little controversy? Professor McNelly's remarks are well worth your attention, both for their own zation which have for too long kept the various literary forms artificially isolated from each other. The year in magazines can be summarized quite briefly, since this whole book is itself a commentary upon that. Analog offered the mixture as before: stories running heavily to ideation, interesting fact articles, and provocative sometimes deliberately infuriatingeditorials. Or was it really quite .the old blend? John Campbell has never stopped pioneering. He has, however, recognized that even a science fiction audience is basically conservative and newness must be sneaked in. For example, you don't see much about "psi" any more; it's simply there, as Anne McCaffrey's yarn bears wit- ness. Analog also enjoyed a gratifying rise in circulation. The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction continued in its own tradition, quite a different one except for Isaac Asimov's column. It was especially noteworthy how many stories here bore immediate relevance to our real, mid- twentieth-century world. Editor Edward Ferman also en- couraged the continued development of such comparatively new writers as Bruce McAllister, K. M. O'Donnell, and Josephine Saxton, who rewarded him with fine contributions. Amazing and Fantastic had their problems, including a midstream change of editors, but nonetheless published a good deal of fresh and worthwhile material. Under Harry |
|
|