"J.R.R. Tolkien - The History of Middle-Earth - 01" - читать интересную книгу автора (Tolkien J.R.R)OF
LOST TALES Part I J. R. R. Tolkien Edited by Christopher Tolkien 85 A Del Rey Book BALLANTINE BOOKS ' NEW YORK FOREWORD. The Book of Lost Tales, written between sixty and seventy years ago, was the first substantial work of imaginative lit- erature by J. R. R. Tolkien, and the first emergence in nar- rative of the Valar, of the Children of Iluvatar, Elves and Men, of the Dwarves and the Orcs, and of the lands in which their history is set, Valinor beyond the western ocean, and Middle-earth, the 'Great Lands' between the seas of east and west. Some fifty-seven years after my father ceased to work on the Lost Tales, The Silmarillion,* profoundly transformed from its distant forerunner, was published; and six years have passed since then. This Foreword seems a suitable opportu- nity to remark on some aspects of both works. The Silmarillion is commonly said to be a 'difficult' book, needing explanation and guidance on how to 'approach' it; and in this it is contrasted' to The Lord of the Rings. In Chap- Shippey accepts that this is so ('The Silmarillion could never be anything but hard to read', p. 201), and expounds his view of why it should be. A complex discussion is not treated justly when it is extracted, but in his view the reasons an: essentially two (p. 185). In the first place, them is in The Silmarillion no 'mediation' of the kind provided by the hob- bits (so, in The Hobbit, 'Bilbo acts as the link between mod- ern times and the archaic world of dwarves and dragons'). * When the name is printed in italics, I refer to the work as published; when in inverted commas, to the work in a mom general way, in any or all of its forms. My father was himself well aware that the absence of hobbits would be felt as a lack, were 'The Silmarillion' to be pub- lished -- and not only by readers with a particular liking for them. In a letter written in 1956 (The Letters of J. R. R. Tolkien, p. 238), soon after the publication of The Lord of the Rings, he said: I do not think it would have the appeal of the L.R. -- no hobbits! Full of mythology, and elvishness, and all that 'heigh stile' (as Chaucer might say), which has been so little to the taste of many reviewers. In 'The Silmarillion' the draught is pure and unmixed; and the reader is worlds away from such 'mediation', such a |
|
|