"Of Essay Writing" - читать интересную книгу автора (Hume David) [TABLE NOT SHOWN]
[TABLE NOT SHOWN] Copyright 1995, Christopher MacLachlan ([email protected]). See end note for details on copyright and editing conventions.[1] Editor's note: "Of Essay Writing" appeared in 1742 in Volume two of Hume's Essays, Moral and Political, but was removed from all subsequent editions of that text published during Hume's life. The text file here is based on the 1875 Green and Grose edition. Spelling and punctuation have been modernized. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Of Essay Writing The elegant part of mankind, who are not immersed in the animal life, but employ themselves in the operations of the mind, may be divided into the learned and conversible. The learned are such as have chosen for their portion the higher and more difficult operations of the mind, which require leisure and solitude, and cannot be brought to perfection, without long preparation and severe labour. The conversible world join to a sociable disposition, and a taste of pleasure, understanding, to obvious reflections on human affairs, and the duties of common life, and to the observation of the blemishes or perfections of the particular objects, that surround them. Such subjects of thought furnish not sufficient employment in solitude, but require the company and conversation of our fellow-creatures, to render them a proper exercise for the mind: and this brings mankind together in society, where every one displays his thoughts and observations in the best manner he is able, and mutually gives and receives information, as well as pleasure. The separation of the learned from the conversible world seems to have been the great defect of the last age, and must have had a very bad influence both on books and company: for what possibility is there of finding topics of conversation fit for the entertainment of rational creatures, without having recourse sometimes to history, poetry, politics, and the more obvious principles, at least, of philosophy? Must our whole discourse be a continued series of gossipping stories and idle remarks? Must the mind never rise higher, but be perpetually Stun'd and worn out with endless chat Of Will did this, and Nan said that?[2] |
|
|