"Matthew Probert - The Mechanics of Human Conversation" - читать интересную книгу автора (Probert Matthew)The subject is GRASS
The person is YOU (implied) The number is The action is GET OFF The location is GRASS The tense is A recall then takes place of the object - "CAT" - this being a common object it is located in fairly close recall memory. Having collected the data about "CAT" the same occurs for the subject - "GRASS" - and the qualifications; "FAT" and "MY". Finally the order is interpreted and the action taken. Little wonder then that often unexpected stimuli of this nature will produce responses like; "What about the cat?" Where the recall process in retrieving data about the object has taken so much effort that it has resulted in the loss of the original stimuli from the short term memory, as in instances of "What were we talking about?" If, upon breaking down the stimuli phrase we find that the "object" is missing, such as in the phrase "They're at it again", we may require qualification of the statement. Before requesting qualification, however, a search will be made of the short-term memory in an attempt to qualify the statement ourselves. Should we find that an onject exists from a previous phrase. For example; "Those damned cats are always fighting" "Oh yes?" "I don't believe it! They're at it again" In the last phrase we will substitute "they" with "those damned cats" from the previously received stimuli phrase that is still alive in the short-term memory, and we may also, upon finding a lack on a required action substitute the action from the previous phrase so that we perceive the stimuli as: "I don't believe it! Those damned cats are fighting again" If we are unable to or we do not exert sufficient effort to qualify the stimuli phrase ourself, we may request qualification from the originator. As in this imaginary intercourse: Mrs A. "They're at it again" Mr B. "Who?" Mrs A. "The cats" Mr B. "Doing what again?" Mrs A. "Fighting!" |
|
© 2025 Библиотека RealLib.org
(support [a t] reallib.org) |